|
Postgraduate
Training Course in Reproductive Health/Chronic Disease
Maternal mortality
Review prepared for the 12th Postgraduate Course in
Reproductive Medicine and Biology, Geneva, Switzerland
Dr Nasr Abdalla Mohamed
Consultant
Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Sudan Ministry of Health
Sudan Fertility Care Association (SFCA)
Khartoum, Sudan
Tutor: Dr Lale Say
World Health Organization
See also
presentation
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the available evidence on the levels of maternal
mortality according to different estimation technique.
METHOD: The WHO ‘maternal mortality and morbidity systematic review
database’ was searched for the articles from 1998. Medline was searched from
1995-2002 using the term “maternal mortality”. Studies were selected
according to their methodological quality and included if they reported
maternal deaths, with reported sample size of 200 and above and only if they
specify the dates of the period of data collection.
RESULTS: Most of the reviewed studies indicated an underestimation in
maternal mortality compared with their findings. The methods for data
collection were either direct (e.g. vital registration system) or by using
special surveys (e.g. direct/indirect sisterhood methods). The review
revealed that there is an increase in maternal mortality in some regions
while there is marked reduction in others. The leading causes of maternal
death were haemorrhage, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, sepsis, pulmonary embolism
and abortion related complications.
Medical conditions and injuries have emerged among the most common causes of
maternal death. An increased risk of pregnancy related death was found for
adolescent pregnant women, women with parity more than five, women with no
access to emergency obstetric care and women with no antenatal care.
Different indicators were used in the reviewed studies.
CONCLUSION : The reported pregnancy-related mortality ratio has increased
in some countries while decreased in others. There is a big gap in maternal
mortality ratio between the developed and the developing countries in favour
of the first. Other causes started to be among the leading ones of maternal
death.
It is difficult to estimate maternal mortality, but important to know its
extent in order to achieve improvement.
In addition to estimate maternal deaths it is important to identify the risk
factors that have adverse effects on pregnancy outcomes.
Introduction
Maternal death refers to the death of a woman while pregnant or within
42 days after the termination of the pregnancy, irrespective of the
duration and site of pregnancy, or cause related to or aggravated by the
pregnancy, or its management; excluding death from accidental or
incidental causes. Late maternal death is defined as maternal death from
direct or indirect obstetric causes occurring more than 42 days but less
than one year after the termination of pregnancy (1).
Maternal mortality rates are difficult to measure and maternal deaths are
hard to identify because of inaccurate reporting. This occurs frequently
with first trimester maternal death. The commonly used approaches for
estimating the levels and causes of maternal deaths are many and vary
between countries. Some of these different techniques are described below.
Sisterhood method
This is a survey-based approach to measure maternal mortality. The
original indirect sisterhood method asks respondents 4 questions about how
many of their sisters have died and whether those who died were pregnant
around the time of death. This method should not be used in certain
situations. For example, when fertility rates are low (TFR less than 3). It
should not be used if maternal mortality is low, due to the need for a large
sample size, as well as during immigration.
Reproductive Age Mortality Studies (RAMOS)
This method has been successfully applied in several countries. This
method utilizes single as well as multiple means of methodology to obtain
death related information e.g. interviews, questionnaire, verbal autopsy.
Vital Registration
This is a well known method of maternal mortality data collection in
developed and in some developing countries. However, no single method is an
exhaustive method for the estimation of maternal mortality. Even where
sophisticated computerized linkages of fetal birth and death certificates to
the death certificate of the mother exists, maternal deaths are frequently
missed or misclassified.
In order to get accurate data, additional sources of information are used
to complement the findings. Other such techniques could be direct household
survey, census, clinical records, etc.
Information about the magnitude and causes of maternal deaths is crucial. By
analysing the causes of maternal deaths and the timing of its occurrence can
help in prioritising the health service delivery at the national level.
Having correct information about maternal deaths helps to observe the
changes in the trends of maternal mortality. Estimation of maternal
mortality can assist in identifying the strength of the method used and its
future application.
Results
-
Among the reviewed
studies to estimate maternal mortality, direct methods (Table
2) were used in 12 studies and indirect (Table 3)
methods in 3 studies.
-
The selection and
use of the methodology depends on the resources available.
-
The studies
reviewed are from different regions, (Africa 6, Latin America and
Caribbean 3, United States of America 3, Europe 2, Asia 1) (Table
1).
-
The study size
ranges from 226 to 893 998.
-
The study size was
not available in one-third of the studies.
-
In 13 out of 15
studies, live births were used as denominator, while two of them used
all deliveries as denominator.
-
The populations
studied are: 33% urban, 14% rural and 53% mixed (Table 1).
-
A definition for
maternal death is not available in 33% of the studies. Among the
available definitions, 33% used ICD-10 within one year after delivery,
and 67% used ICD-10 up to 42 days after delivery.
-
Maternal mortality
ratios range between 8 -1050 per 100 000 live births the lowest in
Netherlands and the highest in Nigeria (Table 1 and
Table 2).
-
Listed by UN
regions the highest maternal mortality ratio was estimated in the region
of Africa (Table 5).
-
By reviewing 15
studies, 1449 cases of maternal deaths were identified and analysed (Table
4).
-
Direct obstetric
causes constitute 56.9% and indirect 43.1%. The most frequent causes of
direct maternal deaths were obstetric haemorrhage, hypertensive
disorders of pregnancy and puerperal sepsis.
Discussion
Having the maternal goal set by the Safe Motherhood Initiative in
Nairobi in 1987, means that policy makers, programmes managers, health
service providers and community leaders need to have accurate estimates of
maternal mortality to be able to measure progress towards this goal.
Measuring maternal mortality accurately is difficult. In most of the
developing countries where maternal mortality is high, vital statistics
which are crucial data sources do not exist. Worldwide, maternal mortality
is generally underestimated because of misclassification or underreporting
of maternal deaths or both. Different studies use different definitions of
maternal death and different methodologies to analyze their data.
In the reviewed studies, maternal mortality was measured by direct
counting or by using a special survey. In some studies, when
underreporting of maternal mortality was suspected, the authors used the
birth and death certificates in addition to patients’ medical records or
special survey designs. For example, in one study conducted in Utah (2),
United States of America, they identified an additional 21 cases of
maternal death by using multiple sources.
The study conducted in Surinam (3) used a reproductive age mortality
survey (RAMSO) in 5 hospitals, in which 85 cases of maternal deaths were
identified. This was 1.3 times higher than the officially reported 65
cases of maternal deaths.
The populations studied in the reviewed studies were urban, rural or
mixed. In the case of developing countries, the more the study is
population-based the more it reflects the magnitude of the maternal
mortality since most of the women deliver at home. Part of the reviewed
studies offered a range of risk factors relevant to maternal death. The
following risk factors were included:
-
Poor or lack of
antenatal care
-
Illiteracy among
pregnant women
-
Teenage pregnancy
-
High parity
-
Delay in referral
from peripheral units
-
Unsafe abortion in
many settings due to lack of family planning programmes
-
Malaria, HIV,
anaemia
-
Harmful traditional
medical beliefs and practices
-
Inadequate
facilities to deal with obstetric emergencies
-
Deteriorating
economies
-
Gender violence
-
Pregnant women age
>40, parity >5
-
Civil war
Trends in maternal mortality show a decrease in some regions
and a rise in others between years 1990-1995 (4). The possible explanation
of the rising maternal mortality in Africa is a group of factors including
the deterioration of the health services, poor resources, civil wars etc.
In the reviewed studies 1449 maternal deaths were identified. The direct
obstetric causes constitute 56.9% and the indirect 43.1%. Haemorrhage,
hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and sepsis are the main causes of
maternal deaths. Abortion, malaria and injuries highly contributed to
maternal deaths in some studies. In Mozambique (5), 15.5% of maternal deaths
were due to malaria.
In Congo, Brazzaville (6), the study conducted in 1996 showed that 40% of
maternal deaths were due to abortion complications. The study conducted in
Argentina (7) revealed that 22 out of 29 maternal deaths were due to unsafe
abortion.
This review of maternal mortality shows trends in the causes of maternal
death are changing in the developed and the developing countries.
Conclusion
Many developing countries have no vital registration system,
so they depend on special surveys. The policy makers, programme managers,
health care providers and community leaders benefit from the estimates of
maternal mortality and identification of the causes of maternal death.
There is more than one indicator to measure maternal mortality. Maternal
mortality ratios vary from country to country, are high in the developing
countries and lower in the developed countries. The causes and risk factors
of maternal deaths are many and variable. Community-based surveys are more
accurate when estimating maternal mortality in developing countries, since
most of the deliveries are conducted at home, and no vital registration
system exists.
Maternal mortality is difficult to measure for many reasons. A range of
different techniques is used to estimate maternal mortality. Maternal
mortality is a major tragedy. Its accurate estimation and assessment of risk
factors is crucial and challengeable.
References
- The sisterhood method for estimating maternal mortality: Guidance
for potential users 1997. WHO/RHT/97.28.
[Free
Full Text]
- Jacob S, Bloebaum L, Shah G, Varner MW. Maternal mortality in Utah.
Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Feb;91(2):187-91. [PubMed]
- Mungra A, van Bokhoven SC, Florie J, van Kanten RW, van Roosmalen J,
Kanhai HH. Reproductive age mortality survey to study under-reporting of
maternal mortality in Surinam. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998
Mar;77(1):37-9. [PubMed]
- Maternal mortality in 1995: Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF,
UNFPA. 2001 WHO/RHR01.9.
[Free
Full Text]
- Granja AC, Machungo F, Gomes A, Bergstrom S, Brabin B.
Malaria-related maternal mortality in urban Mozambique. Ann Trop Med
Parasitol. 1998 Apr;92(3):257-63. [PubMed]
- Le Coeur S, Pictet G, M'Pele P, Lallemant M. Direct estimation of
maternal mortality in Africa. Lancet. 1998 Nov 7;352(9139):1525-6. [PubMed]
- Rizzi RG, Cordoba RR, Maguna JJ. Maternal mortality due to violence.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998 Dec;63 Suppl 1:S19-24. [PubMed]
- Schuitemaker N, van Roosmalen J, Dekker G, van Dongen P, van Geijn
H, Gravenhorst JB. Increased maternal mortality in The Netherlands from
group A streptococcal infections. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998
Jan;76(1):61-4. [PubMed]
- Jocums SB, Berg CJ, Entman SS, Mitchell EF Jr. Postdelivery
mortality in Tennessee, 1989-1991. Obstet Gynecol. 1998 May;91(5 Pt
1):766-70. [PubMed]
- MacLeod J, Rhode R. Retrospective follow-up of maternal deaths and
their associated risk factors in a rural district of Tanzania. Trop Med
Int Health. 1998 Feb;3(2):130-7. [PubMed]
- Vigil-De Gracia P. Maternal mortality in Panama city (CHMCSS),
1992-1996. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998 Jun;61(3):283-4. [PubMed]
- Chandra A. Maternal mortality in Fiji. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998
Dec;63(3):289-91. [PubMed]
- Ronsmans C, Vanneste AM, Chakraborty J, Van Ginneken J. A comparison
of three verbal autopsy methods to ascertain levels and causes of
maternal deaths in Matlab, Bangladesh. Int J Epidemiol. 1998
Aug;27(4):660-6.
[Free
Full Text]
- Aboyeji AP. Trends in maternal mortality in Ilorin, Nigeria
1987-1996. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998 Nov;63(2):183-4. [PubMed]
- Wall LL. Dead mothers and injured wives: the social context of
maternal morbidity and mortality among the Hausa of northern Nigeria.
Stud Fam Plann. 1998 Dec;29(4):341-59. [PubMed]
- Miller FC, Greene JW, Petry JA. Maternal mortality in Kentucky. J Ky
Med Assoc. 1998 Apr;96(4):135-9. [PubMed]
- Smith JB, Fortney JA, Wong E, Amatya R, Coleman NA, de Graft Johnson
J. Estimates of the maternal mortality ratio in two districts of the
Brong-Ahafo region, Ghana. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(5):400-8. [PubMed]
Table 1 : Reviewed studies.
|
Reference |
Country |
Study Period |
Study Design |
Study Size |
Data Source |
Population Studied |
|
Mungra et al.
1998 (3) |
Surinam |
1981-1990 |
Cross-sectional |
1216 |
Medical records |
Urban |
|
Schuitemaker et
al. 1998 (8) |
Netherlands |
1983-1992 |
Cross-sectional |
893998 |
Mutiple sources |
Urban/rural |
|
Le Coeur et al.
1998 (6) |
Congo Brazzaville |
1996 |
Cross-sectional |
27888 |
Mutiple sources |
Urban |
|
Jocums et al.
1998 (9) |
USA (Tennessee) |
1989-1991 |
Cross-sectional |
219731 |
Mutiple sources |
Urban |
|
Jacob
et al. 1998 (2) |
USA (Utah) |
1982-1994 |
Cross-sectional |
484789 |
Mutiple sources |
Urban/rural |
|
MacLeod et al.
1998 (10) |
Tanzania
(Bagamoyo) |
1993 |
Cross-sectional |
NR |
Mutiple sources |
rural |
|
Vigil-De Gracia
1998 (11) |
Panama |
|
Cross-sectional |
NR |
Medical records |
Urban |
|
Chandra 1998 (12) |
Fiji |
1981-1994 |
Cross-sectional |
NR |
Medical records |
Urban/rural |
|
Ronsmans et al.
1998 (13) |
Bangladesh
(Matlab) |
1987-1993 |
Cross-sectional |
NR |
Multiple sources |
Rural |
|
Aboyeji 1998 (14) |
Nigeria (IIorin) |
1987-1006 |
Cross-sectional |
92976 |
Medical records |
Urban/rural |
|
Wall LL 1998 (15) |
Nigeria (Kaduna) |
1976-1979 |
Cross-sectional |
22774 |
Medical records |
Urban/rural |
|
Miller et al.
1998 (16) |
USA (Kentucky) |
1966-1995 |
Cross-sectional |
NR |
Multiple sources |
Urban/rural |
|
Rizzi et al. 1998
(7) |
Argentina
(Cordoba) |
1992-1995 |
Cross-sectional |
272 |
Medical records |
Urban/rural |
|
Granja et al.
1998 (5) |
Mozambique
(Maputo) |
1989-1993 |
Cross-sectional |
74637 |
Medical records |
Urban |
|
Smith et al. 2001
(17) |
Ghana
(Brong-Ahafo) |
1995 |
Cross-sectional |
448 |
Special survey
interview |
Urban/rural |
Table 2 : Levels of Maternal Mortality
(Studies with actual counting).
|
Reference |
Country |
Study setting |
Sample Size |
No. of Maternal death |
M.M. Rate |
M.M Ratio |
Definition of maternal deaths |
|
Mungra et al.
1998 (3) |
Surinam |
Medical facility |
1216 |
104 |
|
|
ICD-10 up to one
year after delivery |
|
Schuitemaker et
al. 1998 (8) |
Netherlands |
National |
|
72 |
|
8.1 |
ICD-9 |
|
Le Coeur et al.
1998 (6) |
Congo Brazzaville |
City |
27888 |
15 |
|
645 |
ICD-10 up to one
year after delivery |
|
Jocums et al.
1998 (9) |
USA (Tennessee) |
City |
219931 |
129 |
58.7 |
|
ICD-10 up to one
year after delivery |
|
Jacob
et al. 1998 (2) |
USA (Utah) |
State |
484789 |
62 |
|
12.8 |
ICD-10 up to 42
days after delivery |
|
Vigil-De Gracia
1998 (11) |
Panama |
City |
|
12 |
|
49.5 |
ICD-10 up to 42
days after delivery |
|
Chandra 1998 (12) |
Fiji |
National |
|
144 |
|
40 |
|
|
Aboyeji 1998 (14) |
Nigeria (IIorin) |
Medical facility |
42976 |
229 |
523 |
|
|
|
Wall LL 1998 (15) |
Nigeria (Kaduna) |
Regional |
22774 |
238 |
|
1050 |
ICD-10 up to 42
days after delivery |
|
Miller et al.
1998 (16) |
USA (Kentucky) |
Regional |
|
321 |
|
|
ICD-10 up to one
year after delivery |
|
Rizzi et al. 1998
(7) |
Argentina
(Cordoba) |
Province |
272 |
26 |
|
|
ICD-10 up to one
year after delivery |
|
Granja et al.
1998 (5) |
Mozambique
(Maputo) |
City |
74637 |
239 |
|
320 |
ICD-10 up to 42
days after delivery |
Table 3 : Levels of Maternal Mortality
(Studies with estimation).
|
Reference |
Country |
Study setting |
Sample Size |
No.
of Maternal death |
M.M
Ratio |
Definition of maternal deaths |
|
MacLeod et al.
1998 (10) |
Tanzania
(Bagamoyo) |
Regional |
|
76 |
961 |
ICD-10 up to 42
days after delivery |
|
Ronsmans et al.
1998 (13) |
Bangladesh
(Matlab) |
Regional |
|
174 |
|
|
|
Smith et al. 2001
(17) |
Ghana
(Brong-Ahafo) |
District |
448 |
72 |
328 |
ICD-10 up to 42
days after delivery |
Table 4 : Causes of maternal deaths in 12
reviewed studies (n=1449).
|
Condition (direct causes) |
No. of deaths (n = 826) |
% (56.9) |
|
Haemorrhage |
309 |
21.3 |
|
Hypertensive
Disorders of Pregnancy |
172 |
11.9 |
|
Sepsis |
150 |
10.3 |
|
Abortion |
109 |
7.5 |
|
Obstetric
embolism |
65 |
4.5 |
|
Obstructed
labour |
21 |
1.4 |
|
Condition (indirect causes) |
No. of deaths (n = 623) |
% (43) |
|
Injuries |
79 |
12.7 |
|
Malaria |
41 |
6.6 |
|
Others |
503 |
80.1 |
Table 5 : New regional estimates of maternal
mortality ratios (per 100 000 live births).
|
UN Region |
Maternal mortality ratio |
|
1990 |
1995 |
|
World total |
430 |
400 |
|
Africa |
870 |
1000 |
|
Asia |
390 |
280 |
|
Latin America &
Caribbean |
190 |
190 |
|
Europe
|
36 |
28 |
|
Northern America |
11 |
11 |
Source: WHO/UNICEF/UNFPA 1995 (4)

Print this page

Edited by Aldo Campana,
|