|
8th Postgraduate Course for Training in Reproductive Medicine and Reproductive
Biology
Eastern Europe Annual Technical
Report 1997
J. Kasonde and H. Honkanen
HRP - UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme
REGIONAL STRATEGY
The gravity of the health problems, particularly reproductive
health problems, resulting from the political and socioeconomic upheavals
in eastern Europe in the late 1980s was recognized by the Programme in 1990.
In that year, an initiative was taken to bring together scientists from
WHO Collaborating Centres in the region to assess the research and service
needs in reproductive health. Areas requiring priority research were later
identified and documented at a special meeting in Szeged, Hungary in 1993.
Considering that the infrastructure for research already
existed to a large extent in the region, the strategy adopted by the Programme
was to promote the design and conduct of research, with a small investment
(not exceeding 20 per cent of available resources) in research training,
mainly related to the proposed research projects. The bulk of funding for
the implementation of research projects was to be sought from multilateral
and bilateral donors.
In January 1994, a Scientific Working Group (SWG) on
Reproductive Health Research in Eastern Europe was established to promote
and coordinate research and training in the region. The Group first met
in Geneva in 1994. The first six research proposals were developed in that
year but funding has subsequently proved difficult as donor support was
not forthcoming.
RESEARCH PROJECTS
Three research areas were selected for initial studies,
based on the priorities of the region: family planning, abortion and perinatal
care.
Family planning
The prevalence of modern contraceptive use remains
low in most countries of eastern and central Europe, making abortion a major
method of fertility regulation. Three projects were designed to increase
understanding of this problem and suggest solutions.
The first project concerns the determinants of the
choice and use of fertility regulation methods in the region. It aims to
explain why modern contraceptive prevalence remains low despite the existence
of contraceptive services. The project was ongoing in 1997. The second study
is a randomized, comparative clinical trial of once-a-month and three-monthly
injectable contraceptives. It aims to examine the acceptability (as well
as safety and efficacy) of long-acting injectable methods which are currently
not included in most of the family planning programmes of the region. The
third study in this area is on the acceptance and follow-up of different
contraceptive methods in parous women. The latter two projects could not
start in 1997 due to unresolved methodological and financial issues.
Abortion
The impact on service delivery of introducing mifepristone
and misoprostol for early termination of pregnancy is the subject of one
study in this field. The proposal was undergoing scientific and ethical
review in 1997.
Another proposal, on mortality and morbidity related
to induced abortion, was also at various stages of review and modification
in the course of the year.
Perinatal care
Countries of eastern Europe have perinatal mortality
rates two to four times higher than those in western Europe in spite of
health care services with full coverage. To understand the reasons for this
difference a structured perinatal audit was adapted from previous studies
in Denmark and Sweden. Latvia, Lithuania, and Russia are participating in
this study which was ongoing through 1997.
Other studies
Due to financial difficulties it was not possible to
initiate other studies in the year. But the Programme’s protocol on the
standardized management of infertility was adapted in Yerevan, Armenia,
in a study to evaluate the causes of infertility in the country.
Publications
A special session at the XV World Congress of the International
Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) in August 1997 in Copenhagen,
Denmark was devoted to reproductive health in eastern Europe. The eight
papers presented will be published in 1998.
RESEARCH TRAINING
The Programme contributed financially and technically
to the annual Postgraduate Course for Training in Reproductive Medicine
and Reproductive Biology hosted by the University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Several candidates from eastern Europe participated in the course.
A Scientific and Technical Advisory Group on Training
in Reproductive Health was established by the WHO Regional Office for Europe
to coordinate training relevant to eastern Europe. This Group and the Programme’s
SWG are exploring ways of working together.
FUTURE PLANS
The limited research programme in eastern Europe has
been slow to start but is now well under way. In the immediate future, the
implementation of already developed projects is a priority. In the long-term,
the building-up of capacity in social science research should receive urgent
attention. There has been a slight increase in funding to the region from
the Programme. This should ensure implementation of approved research projects.
Funding from sources other than the Programme will continue to be sought.
The involvement of scientists from the central Asian
Republics still needs to be increased. A setback in this direction was the
withdrawal of the only scientist from the subregion who served on the SWG
due to his transfer to other duties in his home country. New initiatives
will need to be taken in the next year.
Mechanisms for collaboration between the SWG and the
Advisory Group set up at the WHO Regional Office in Copenhagen will be a
subject for discussion in 1998.
Annex 1
SCIENTIFIC WORKING GROUP ON REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH RESEARCH
IN EASTERN EUROPE IN 1997
Members
- S. Alexaniants, (Chairman) Armenian Research Centre
of Maternal and Child Health Protection, Yerevan, Armenia
- A. Campana, Clinic for Infertility and Gynaecological
Endocrinology, Geneva, Switzerland
- M. Horga, Institute of Public Health and Medical
Research, Targu-Mures, Romania
- L. Kovacs, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical University,
Szeged, Hungary
- *G. Lindmark, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
- P. Velebil, Institute for Maternal and Child Care,
Prague, Czech Republic
- *E. Vikhlyaeva, Research Centre of Obstetrics,
Gynaecology and Perinatology, Moscow, the Russian Federation
*Denotes woman

Print this page

Edited by Aldo Campana,
|