|
Training in Research in Reproductive Health/Sexual Health Bibliographic review: writing guidelines for participants Regina Kulier Title page: title, authors for example: Barriers to contraceptive uptake in rural Southern Africa John Smith1*, Mary Johnson 1,2*, Peter MS Stone3§ 1Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Geneva,
Switzerland *These authors contributed equally to this work Email addresses: JS:
john@johnsmith.ch Abstract Structured: Background, Methods, Results, Conclusion (about 200-250 words) Introduction, background This should give information about the importance of the problem, a brief outline what is already known on the topic, the aim of the review and its justification. Methods This should describe the design, settings, types of participants/ materials involved; it should clearly state type(s) of intervention(s) and outcome measurements and the type of analysis used. Results This should give a description of the findings, incl. results of statistical analyses if appropriate; reference to tables if available. Discussion This section should discuss the findings compared to previous research, its applicability and generate new hypotheses if possible. It should also include possible shortcomings of the research. It should NOT be a repetition of the 'Results ' section! Conclusion Should clearly summarise the main findings of the research. Competing interests All authors need to state if they have competing interests, meaning, if the research may be influenced by a relationship of the authors with other persons/companies. These relationships may be financial or personal and need to be mentioned. Acknowledgements Authors contributions References for example: (from PubMed - provide link to abstract or to full text document) Giha HA, Elghazali G, A-Elgadir TM, A-Elbasit IE, Eltahir EM, Baraka OZ, Khier MM, Adam I, Troye-Blomberg M, Theander TG, Elbashir MI. Clinical pattern of severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Sudan in an area characterized by seasonal and unstable malaria transmission. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2005 Apr;99(4):243-251. [PubMed Abstract] Gulmezoglu AM, Say L, Betran AP, Villar J, Piaggio G. WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004 Jul 05;4(1):16. [PubMed Abstract] [Full Text] Pattinson RC, Vandecruys HI, Macdonald AP, Mantel GD: Why do women die during childbirth. [http://www.scienceinafrica.co.za/2001/august/mothers.htm] 2001. In general:
Edited by Aldo Campana, |