|
Practical Training and Research in Gynecologic Endoscopy
Current status of gynaecologic endoscopy
and experience with training in South America
L. Devoto and A. Fuentes
Institute for maternal and child research
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
School of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago
Introduction
Background
Laparoscopy was first introduced to South America during
the 1970s. Several international agencies such as United States Agency for
International Development (USAID) and Johns Hopkins University Program for
International Education in Reproductive Health (JHPIEGO) funded training
programmes to train physicians in the public sector and to increase the
capability of newly created endoscopic fertility centres. The goal was to
provide an ambulatory laparoscopic tubal sterilization service.
The development of these programmes was orientated towards
demographic control. At that time, very few fertility centres in the region
used laparoscopy for gynaecological diagnosis or minor surgical procedures.
It was not until the next decade that a number of young gynaecologists trained
in the field of Reproductive Medicine in Europe or USA under the sponsorship
of the Human Reproduction Programme of WHO, Ford or Rockefeller Foundations
returned to their home countries and employed these endoscopic techniques
for diagnostic, therapeutic or research purposes. The majority of these
physicians were able to perform endoscopic techniques in the field of human reproduction, particularly in fertility promoting surgery.
Hysteroscopy became an increasingly popular procedure in
South America in the late 1980s. The European gynaecologists, especially
the French and Italians, played a important role in the introduction of
this technique to the region.
The other major contribution to endoscopy was the introduction
of video-endoscopy in the late 1980s, promoting a sudden increase in the
number of procedures performed by laparoscopy and hysteroscopy. The development
of more advanced surgery such as ovarian cystectomy, the treatment of ectopic
pregnancy, hysterectomy, endometrial ablation and resection of polyps has
stimulated greater interest in endoscopy among gynaecologists.
During the 1970s and 80s gynaecological endoscopy in South
America was in carried out in both the public and academic sector. However
due to resource constraints and the limited number of trained personnel,
endoscopy has moved rapidly into the private sector in the 1990s.
Indications for Gynaecological Endoscopy
in South America
The following list represents the most popular endoscopic
procedures.
-
Diagnostic Laparoscopy and/or Hysteroscopy:
-
Evaluation of female infertility
-
Chronic pelvic pain
-
Pelvic inflammatory disease
-
Evaluation of uterine bleeding
-
Surgical Laparoscopy or Hysteroscopy
-
Female sterilization.
-
Diathermy to endometriosis or laparoscopic management
of endometrioma
-
Adhesiolysis
-
Tubal pregnancy
-
Management of benign ovarian cysts
-
Resection of submucous myomas
-
Asherman’s syndrome
-
Removal of endometrial polyps
-
Endometrial ablation
Hysterectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy, pre-sacral neurectomy
and laparoscopic surgery for incontinence are performed in a limited number
of Institutions in South America.
Current training opportunities in Gynaecological
Endoscopy
The availability of training in gynaecological endoscopy
is a limiting factor in South America. Diagnostic endoscopic procedures
are part of the residency training programme in a limited number of centres.
Operative laparoscopy or hysteroscopy are only part of the fellowship training
programme in human reproduction. Few academic institutions in the region
have an accreditation programme for this type of surgery. The cost and the
maintenance of equipment can be too high for many public or academic health
institutions in South America. This, together with the difficulty in obtaining
supplies and replacements, represent a limiting factor in the development
of endoscopy.
Role of the Endoscopic Industry
The endoscopic industry has played a major role in the introduction
of the new endoscopic procedures. Several postgraduate courses in South
America have been sponsored by different endoscopic companies but limited
funds have been invested in practical and research training activity in
the region.
Accreditation
Several countries in the region have a number of skilled
endoscopic surgeons but there is a lack of criteria for accreditation of
centres in South America in. There is an urgent need to develop guidelines
for the accreditation of centres. These criteria should take into consideration
the viability of a qualified core faculty, core facilities, the duration
of training, the evaluation of the trainee and medico-legal responsibility
of the trainee, institution and supervisor.
Gynaecological Societies, Ministry of Health or Academic
Institutions in collaboration with the World Health Organization should
promote guidelines for accreditation of endoscopic centres and individuals
since industry is stimulating general obstetricians and gynaecologists in
the private sector to adopt these techniques as standard procedures in gynaecological
practice.
Conclusion
It is accepted that the development of endoscopic surgery
represents a major advance in reproductive surgery. However progress must
not be limited to a few skilled surgeons and the advantages of such techniques
in efficiency and safety must be made available to all patients. In order
to reach this goal there is an urgent need o change both undergraduate and
postgraduate education in gynaecological endoscopy. The public, academic
and private sectors must be stimulated to establish postgraduate Research
and Training Programmes in this field and provide guidelines for accreditation
of centres or individuals. This is important to avoid unnecessary injuries
to the patients by unskilled surgeons who could jeopardize the acceptance
of this new access to surgical exploration of the pelvis.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Dr. Irene Furman PhD, Dr. Cristian
Miranda and Dr. Emilio Fernandez for their comments regarding the present
status of the Research and Training Programme in the region.

Print this page

Edited by Aldo Campana,
|