|
Practical Training and Research in Gynecologic Endoscopy
Complications
of laparoscopy
A. G. Gordon
Honorary Consultant Gynaecologist, Princess Royal Hospital,
Saltshouse Road, Hull HU8 9HE
and
Consultant Gynaecologist, BUPA Hospital Hull & East Riding,
Lowfield road, Anlaby, Hull HU10 7AZ, United Kingdom
INTRODUCTION
Complications can occur with any form of surgery The prevalence
is difficult to assess because there have been no national surveys since
those carried out by the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
in 1976 and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists in 1977.
At that time laparoscopy was virtually confined to diagnostic procedures
and sterilisation. Only occasional other minor operative procedures were
performed. A very few centres had begun to treat ectopic pregnancies, divide
adhesions and perform salpingostomy.
As operative laparoscopy becomes more widely accepted, new
techniques are being developed and more surgeons are adopting this form
of management, the complication rate can be expected to rise. The incidence
of laparoscopic complications is 1.1% to 5.2% in minor procedures and 2.5%
to 6% in major ones (Kane & Krejs, 1984). It is becoming increasingly evident
that, in order to reduce the prevalence of complications, training programmes
must include supervision at all levels of development and there must be
a high degree of awareness of the potential risks of laparoscopic surgery.
Complications may be associated with:
- The anaesthetic
- The induction of pneumoperitoneum
- Insertion of primary and secondary trocars
- Thermal Instruments
- Mechanical Instruments
- Other associated conditions
1. THE ANAESTHETIC
Complications directly attributable to the general anaesthetic
are no different from those which may occur when any other type of surgery
is performed. Some features of laparoscopic surgery predispose to specific
anaesthetic complications.
The use of a steep Trendelenburg position and the distension
of the abdomen may both reduce excursion of the diaphragm. Carbon dioxide
(CO2) can be absorbed particularly during prolonged operations. Monitoring
by pulse oximetry, the use of endotracheal intubation and positive pressure
assisted ventilation reduce the risk of hypercarbia to a minimum. If arrhythmia
occurs the anaesthetist will be responsible for its management and is at
liberty to instruct the surgeon to return the patient to the supine position,
evacuate the pneumoperitoneum and discontinue the surgery.
Vasovagal reflex may produce shock and collapse especially
if the anaesthetic is not deep enough. Again it may be prevented by efficient
anaesthesia and should only be diagnosed when other causes of shock have
been excluded.
Local anaesthesia may be used for tubal sterilisation and
some other minor procedures. This may produce specific problems and complications:
1. Anxiety.
Anxiety may be prevented by administration of Diazepam 20
mg orally about one hour pre-operatively.
2. Vasovagal reaction.
This may be associated with bradycardia and, in more severe
cases, cardiac arrest, convulsion and shock. The treatment should include:
- Atropine 0.5 mg given intravenously (IV)
- Oxygen given by endotracheal tube at a rate of 4-6 litres/minute
- Adrenaline 0.5-1.0 ml of 1:100,000 solution given slowly IV
- Respiratory and cardiac resuscitation.
3. Pain.
Pain may be prevented to some extent by the administration
of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as mefanimic acid, naprosene
or fentanyl. It is prudent to have an anaesthetist available because about
2% of patients find the operation painful and consideration must be given
to completing it under general anaesthesia (Gordon, 1984).
4. Allergic reactions and anaphylaxis.
Any local anaesthetic should be given initially as a small
test dose to determine if an unsuspected hypersensitivity exists. Obviously
if it does, no more medication should be administered. If a reaction occurs
it will be characterised by agitation, flushing, palpitations, bronchospasm,
pruritus and urticaria. The treatment will depend on the severity of the
reaction and may include:
- Adrenaline 0.5 mg (1:100,000 solution IVI or IMI)
- Prednisolone 25 mg IVI
- Theophylline 250 mg (10ml) given slowly IVI
- Intravenous fluids
- Oxygen
INDUCTION OF PNEUMOPERITONEUM
1. Extra-peritoneal gas insufflation
Failure to introduce the Veress' needle into the peritoneal
cavity may produce extra-peritoneal emphysema. This occurs in about 2 per
cent of cases. The diagnosis is made by palpation of crepitus caused by
bubbles of CÓ2 under the skin.. If this is recognised early, the gas may
be allowed to escape and the needle re-introduced through the same or another
site.
If the complication is not recognised during the introduction
of gas, the typical appearance of extra-peritoneal gas may be recognised
when an attempt is made to introduce the telescope. It is always essential
to view through the telescope during its insertion through its cannula.
The typical spider-web appearance caused by pre-peritoneal insufflation
will be seen when the telescope reaches the end of the cannula and further
stripping of the peritoneum by the tip of the telescope avoided. The laparoscope
should be withdrawn and attempts made to express the gas. The needle may
then be re-introduced through the same or another site. Alternatively the
trocar and cannula may be introduced by 'open laparoscopy'.
2. Mediastinal emphysema
Gas may extend from a correctly induced pneumoperitoneum
into the mediastinum and create mediastinal emphysema. Extensive emphysema
may cause cardiac embarrassment which will be diagnosed by the anaesthetist.
There will be loss of dullness to percussion over the precordium. The laparoscopy
must be abandoned and as much gas as possible evacuated. The patient must
be kept under close observation until the gas has been absorbed.
3. Pneumothorax
Pneumothorax may result from insertion of the Veress' needle
into the pleural cavity. Whenever a high site of insertion is chosen the
needle should be directed away from the diaphragm and, as always, the standard
protocol of aspiration and sounding tests employed.
Pneumothorax should be suspected if there is difficulty
in ventilating the patient. There may be a contra-lateral mediastinal shift
and increased tympanism over the affected area. The procedure should be
abandoned and the gas allowed to escape. The patient should be kept under
observation. Occasionally assisted ventilation and insertion of a pleural
tube may be required.
4. Pneumo-omentum
The omentum is penetrated by the Veress' needle in about
2 per cent of cases. The misplacement should be recognised by the aspiration
test and the position of the tip altered to free the needle. There will
also be a raised insufflation pressure which should lead the surgeon to
suspect an error in the position of the needle. The condition is usually
innocuous unless and omental blood vessel is punctured.
5. Injury to gastro-intestinal tract
Certain conditions may predispose to injury by the Veress'
needle. These include distension of the gastro-intestinal tract or adhesions
of bowel to the abdominal wall.
Penetration of the stomach may occur when an upper abdominal
site of insertion is chosen or the stomach is distended during induction
of anaesthesia. Gastric distension may also occur if anaesthesia is maintained
with a mask and should be suspected if there is upper abdominal distension
or increased tympanism. In this case the stomach should be aspirated with
a naso-gastric tube. The diagnosis of gastric perforation by the Veress'
needle may be made when the patient belches gas. The laparoscope should
be introduced and the stomach inspected carefully. Provided the stomach
wall has not been torn, no surgical treatment is necessary but a broad spectrum
antibiotic should be given. If the stomach has been torn, surgical repair
either by laparotomy or laparoscopy is mandatory.
Aspiration following initial insertion of the needle should
permit early recognition of perforation of the bowel but it is not fool-proof.
Bowel penetration should be suspected if there is asymmetric abdominal distension,
belching, passing of flatus or a faecal odour. The induction of pneumoperitoneum
should be stopped and the needle re-sited to introduce the pneumoperitoneum
correctly. The gastro-intestinal tract should be examined carefully for
perforation. It is important that both sides of the bowel be examined as
the exit wound may be larger than the entry wound. Faecal soiling demands
immediate laparotomy and repair of the bowel. It is important to ensure
that there has not been a through-and-through injury of a loop of bowel
which is adherent to the peritoneum at the site of insertion. A simple needle
penetration requires no treatment but the patient should be kept under observation
and given broad spectrum antibiotics.
6. Bladder injury
Routine catheterisation of the bladder and proper siting
of the needle should prevent bladder penetration. If pneumaturia is noted
the needle should be partially withdrawn and the creation of pneumoperitoneum
continued. The bladder peritoneum should be carefully inspected to ensure
that no significant injury has been caused. The treatment of a simple puncture
is conservative with postoperative bladder drainage.
7. Blood vessel injury
The Veress' needle may penetrate omental or mesenteric vessels
or any of the major abdominal or pelvic arteries or veins. Minor vascular
injuries involving the omental or mesenteric vessels are difficult to prevent
as it is impossible to ensure that the omentum is not close to the abdominal
wall during blind insertion of the insufflating needle. Injury may be suspected
if blood returns up the open needle or if free blood is seen in the peritoneal
cavity after insertion of the laparoscope. If blood returns up the needle
and the patient's condition is stable, the site of injury may be investigated
laparoscopically. The needle should be left in place and a 5mm laparoscope
introduced through a suprapubic cannula. Minimal bleeding may usually be
controlled by bipolar coagulation or a laparoscopic suture. Laparotomy is
not usually necessary except in the case of injury to the superior mesenteric
artery. Such injury requires repair by a vascular surgeon (Bassil et al,
1993)..
Injury to the major vessels may be prevented by lifting
the abdominal wall, angling the needle towards the pelvis once the initial
thrust through the fascia has been made and by inserting only as much of
the needle as necessary. Thin patients and children are at particular risk
of this injury.
Withdrawal of blood on aspiration following insertion of
the needle should allow early detection of blood vessel injury. If injury
to a vessel such as the aorta, inferior vena cava or common iliac vessel
is suspected, the needle should be left place to mark the site of the injury
and laparotomy performed through a mid-line incision. There is usually a
large haematoma which obscures the site of the injury. The aorta should
be compressed with a clamp or hand until a vascular surgeon arrives to perform
definitive surgery.
Dramatic collapse may result from penetration of a major
vessel but the bleeding may not be immediately evident if it is retro-peritoneal.
The loose areolar tissue anterior to the aorta can allow accumulation of
a considerable amount of blood before frank intra-abdominal bleeding is
seen. A thorough search must be made to determine the extent of vessel damage.
This includes retraction of bowel to expose the aorta above the pelvic brim
which is the most common site of perforation. Failure to do so may result
in continued bleeding and formation of a large haematoma leading to a second
episode of shock some hours later
8. Gas embolism
Intravascular insufflation of gas may lead to gas embolism
or even death. This can only happen if the penetration by the Veress' needle
goes unrecognised and insufflation commences. It should be prevented by
routine use of the aspiration test. The patient should be turned on to the
left lateral position and, if immediate recovery does not take place, cardiac
puncture performed to release the gas.
9. Puncture of liver or spleen
The liver or spleen may be punctured by the Veress' needle
when a high insertion site is chosen. It may also occur in the presence
of hepatomegaly or splenomegaly. The aspiration test and the high insufflation
pressure will make it obvious that the needle is sited incorrectly in which
case it should be withdrawn and re-sited.
10. Complications from the distension medium
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the distension medium most commonly
used for operative laparoscopy. Gas embolism is possible but uncommon because
the gas is highly soluble and is reabsorbed so quickly that, even if there
has been a moderate embolus, the circulatory changes return to normal within
a few minutes and the patient recovers. Up to 400ml of gas may be intravasated
without producing changes in the ECG.
Cardiac arrythmia may be due to excessive absorption of
CO2. It is important to monitor the intra-abdominal pressure throughout
the operation and to use an automatic pneumoflator for all but the simplest
forms of surgery. This will cut out if the intra-abdominal pressure rises.
Endotracheal intubation and positive pressure respiration will also help
to prevent complications from CO2 insufflation.
Post-operative pain is common with CO2 insufflation due
to peritoneal irritation which is a result of conversion of CO2 to carbonic
acid. The chest pain may be confused with coronary heart disease and be
treated inappropriately with anti-coagulants. This may produce a wound haematoma
or intraperitoneal bleeding.
Nitrous oxide (N2O) has become popular with some laparoscopists
because there are less side effects than with CO2. Anaesthetists can dispense
with intubation and allow the patient to breath through a laryngeal mask.
However, in modern laparoscopic practice, a diagnostic laparoscopy may develop
into a complicated operative procedure. N2O supports combustion. Methane
gas may be released into the peritoneal cavity following bowel injury. A
high frequency monopolar current used during laparoscopic surgery may cause
an explosion.
The main place for N2O is when laparoscopy is being performed
under local anaesthesia in which case the pain factor becomes important.
This is applicable to tubal sterilisation with clips, rings, or bipolar
coagulation, but not to more advanced laparoscopic procedures.
INTRODUCTION OF TROCARS AND CANNULAE
Some of the most serious injuries that occur during laparoscopy
are caused by the insertion of the trocars and cannulae. Insertion of the
primary trocar and cannula is, of necessity, blind. The causation of injuries
by the primary trocar are similar to those caused by the Veress' needle
but the magnitude of the injury is greater.
The sites of the secondary portals of entry must be selected
carefully and the insertion must always be made under visual control.
1. Injury to vessels in the abdominal wall
Superficial bleeding from the incision rarely gives rise
to concern and always stops with application of pressure.
Bleeding from puncture of the deep inferior epigastric artery
is more serious. The artery is at risk during the insertion of secondary
trocars and cannulae. This may be prevented by transilluminating the abdominal
wall before insertion in a thin patient or by visualising the artery laparoscopically
as it runs lateral to the obliterated umbilical artery. The site of insertion
can then be chosen by depressing the wall skin with the handle of the scalpel
and noting its relationship to the vessels.
The diagnosis may be made by the sight of blood dripping
into the pelvis from the trocar wound. Occasionally blood may actually be
seen spurting across the abdominal cavity. Alternatively the immediate or
delayed appearance of a large abdominal wall haematoma indicates injury
to the deep inferior epigastric artery.
The treatment is usually simple. The trocar and cannula
should be left in situ to act as a marker and also prevent the artery slipping
away. A Foley catheter passed down the cannula and inflated may act as a
compress and control the bleeding. Alternatively the incision should be
enlarged to about 2 cm in length to expose the anterior rectus sheath. A
round bodied needle should be inserted through the full thickness of the
abdominal wall from the sheath to the peritoneum under laparoscopic control.
The needle point should be brought out again to the surface of the rectus
sheath and a knot tied firmly on the sheath. This is preferable to tying
the knot on the skin which is painful and leaves an unsightly scar although
it is acceptable to tie the knot over a gauze swab to prevent skin injury.
It may be necessary to insert two sutures, one above and one below the site
of bleeding.
Occasionally it may be necessary to open the wound wider
to locate the bleeding artery. This should be reserved for those cases where
there is profuse bleeding or primary laparoscopic suturing is ineffective.
2. Injury to an intra-abdominal vessel
Injury to minor blood vessels is usually self-limiting or
can be controlled by bipolar electro-coagulation. Damage to major vessels
is more serious than with a Verres' needle because of the size of the trocar
tip and may result in profuse bleeding. Injury to omental vessels may compromise
the vitality of a segment of bowel. Treatment of these injuries is by resuscitation,
laparotomy, vascular repair or ligation and, where necessary, bowel resection
and anastomosis with the assistance of the appropriate surgical colleague.
A small leak from the a major vein may not be immediately
apparent. The intra-abdominal pressure of the pneumoperitoneum and the decreased
venous pressure induced by the Trendelenburg position may temporarily control
it. However, as soon as the intra-abdominal and venous pressures return
to normal, the bleeding may recommence and produce a retro-peritoneal haematoma
and shock.
It is essential therefore, at the completion of any laparoscopic
procedure, but especially those involving the pelvic side wall, to inspect
the course of the major vessels and look for a haematoma. This applies particularly
to the treatment of endometriosis at this site. A small haematoma may be
the only evidence of injury to a vein at the pelvic brim. Occasionally there
may be a defect in the overlying peritoneum which indicates the site of
entry of the trocar. It is essential to proceed to laparotomy to repair
the vessel. A vascular surgeon should be consulted and the vessel compressed
until the arrival of specialised assistance.
3. Injury to a hollow viscus
Injury to a hollow viscus may vary from superficial damage
of the serosa to complete penetration into the lumen. If penetration has
occurred the viscus may slip off the trocar, the trocar may remain within
the lumen or, rarely, the trocar may pass right through the a loop of bowel
which becomes impaled upon it. It is always important to inspect the bowel
at the axis of insertion of the primary trocar and cannula to ensure that
it has not been damaged. If the cannula remains within the bowel the injury
will be obvious by the recognition of mucosal folds. A through and through
injury may be missed and only become apparent by the sight of faecal soiling,
a faecal smell when the pneumoperitoneum is released or the subsequent development
of peritonitis.
Injury to the stomach or bowel are always serious. The management
depends on the skill of the surgeon. The classical treatment is to perform
laparotomy and suture the bowel in two layers. A skilled surgeon may perform
the repair by laparoscopic suturing. The defect should be closed in two
layers in such a way as to avoid stricture formation, there should be copious
peritoneal irrigation and a drain should be inserted into the abdomen. Appropriate
antibiotic therapy should be instituted.
It may not be possible to identify the site of injury by
laparoscopy. In this case it is essential to perform laparotomy to find
and treat the bowel injury. Failure to do this will result in the patient
developing faecal peritonitis and becoming dangerously ill.
Bladder laceration may occur during mobilisation of the
bladder in advanced pelvic surgery. It should be sutured in two layers using
laparoscopic suturing technique and a Foley catheter inserted into the bladder.
4. Damage to other organs
Minor injuries to other organs are usually self-limiting.
They should be inspected at the completion of the procedure. Peritoneal
lavage must be carried out to remove blood and clot and ensure that the
bleeding has stopped. A small puncture on the surface of the uterus may
be treated with bipolar electro-coagulation if bleeding does not stop spontaneously.
Injuries to the liver and spleen are rare unless the organ
is pathologically enlarged. Such injuries are more likely to occur in operations
performed by general surgeons. Minor bleeding will stop spontaneously. Major
haemorrhage requires immediate laparotomy.
THERMAL DAMAGE
Burns from electric current were one of the major causes
of complications when monopolar tubal coagulation was the principle method
of female sterilisation. The incidence of burns was dramatically reduced
by the introduction of bipolar and thermal coagulation and mechanical devices
to occlude the tubes.
Monopolar electric current passes into the patient's body
from the electrode which may be forceps or a needle. The current passes
into the patient's tissues at the point of contact and then must return
to the generator via the return plate. This is usually placed on the patient's
leg. The effect of the electric current will depend its power and the power
density which, in turn depends on the area and duration of application.
To obtain maximum tissue effect the area of application at the target organ
is small. The current passes from that small area along the path of least
resistance towards the return plate. In gynaecological surgery this pathway
is usually over the surface of loops of bowel. The area of the return plate
is large so the power density at its site of application to the skin is
low. However on its return pathway the current may pass over a small area
of contact between two organs. The power density at that point may be high.
In this way a burn may occur outside the surgeon's visual field. Normally
this does not happen and the current passes harmlessly to the dispersive
plate.
Thermal injury to organs such as bowel may also result from
leakage of current from the shaft of the instrument. This leakage may result
from insufficient or faulty insulation or from capacitative coupling in
which there is a build up of current in the shaft of the instrument because
the normal escape route has been shut off. Current normally escapes from
the metal cannula through the patient's anterior abdominal wall to the return
plate. If a plastic cannula has been used this route is closed and the current
may escape to bowel. If the contact point between instrument and bowel is
small, the power density may be high and thermal injury will result.
Occasionally the monitoring system may not be properly earthed.
If the current passes via an ECG electrode instead of to the return plate,
the patient may suffer a skin burn because the ECG electrode is small and
so the power density is high at this site. Alternatively, the current may
pass along one of the ancillary instruments which, if not properly insulated,
may produce a skin burn at the portal of entry or the surgeon may suffer
a burn on the hands or face.
There is a danger of lateral heat spread with monopolar
or bipolar current. It is important to ensure that no other organ is in
contact with or near an organ to which electricity is being applied. Lateral
spread may also be minimised by keeping the forceps blades close together.
Build-up of thermal energy may be prevented by intermittent application
of energy which, in effect, produces a pulsed current.
The bowel is the most commonly injured organ. The injury
may range from minor blanching of the serosa to frank perforation. Perforation
requires laparotomy, excision of the surrounding devitalised bowel and repair
of the defect. If blanching is significant, laparotomy excision of the damaged
tissue and surgical repair should be performed immediately. Failure to do
so may result in delayed ischaemic necrosis at the site of the burn. Initially
there may be few symptoms but commonly the patient will complain of feeling
unwell and this feeling may not improve as quickly as usual. It should be
realised that any patient who feels unwell on the day after surgery and
whose condition does not improve over the next few hours, may have an unsuspected
injury to the bowel. The unwary physician may allow the patient to return
home. The insidious development of vague abdominal symptoms, discomfort,
anorexia and possibly pyrexia may not be recognised by her medical attendants.
A faecal fistula may not form for 48-72 hours. Fecal peritonitis slowly
develops and the patient may become seriously ill over a period of days
before re-admission is requested. Radiology followed by laparotomy reveals
the desperate situation. Laparotomy is followed by repair of the bowel or,
more often, colostomy and drainage of the peritoneum. A prolonged period
of serious illness may follow.
It must always be remembered that electric current is potentially
dangerous and all the safety rules for its use must be strictly obeyed.
INJURY FROM MECHANICAL INSTRUMENTS
The main injuries caused by scissors or forceps are to a
blood vessels. Bleeding will be immediately obvious and should be controlled
by bipolar or thermocoagulation or by suturing. Direct inadvertent injury
to other organs by mechanical instruments may result from careless or clumsy
use.
OTHER COMPLICATIONS
A number of other complications may result from laparoscopy.
1. Cervical laceration
It is common for the cervical tenaculum to cause a laceration
of the anterior lip of cervix. The cervix should always be inspected at
the end of the procedure. The bleeding may usually be controlled by pressure
from sponge forceps but occasionally requires suturing.
2. Uterine perforation
Uterine perforation may be caused by the manipulating cannula
or during dilatation and curettage. The perforation should always be inspected
with the laparoscope during and at the end of the procedure. Bleeding is
usually slight and the complication does not usually require treatment.
3. Shoulder pain
Carbon dioxide is converted to carbonic acid when it is
in solution with body fluids. This is irritant to the peritoneum. Diaphragmatic
peritoneal irritation produces pain which is referred to the shoulder by
the phrenic nerve. This pain may be confused with cardiac pain by the unwary
physician and treated inappropriately.
4. Pelvic inflammatory disease
There is a small risk of producing or exacerbating a pelvic
infection by uterine cannulation and chromopertubation. Post-operative pelvic
infection is probably less common after laparoscopic surgery than after
laparotomy.
5. Omental and Richter's herniation
If the primary cannula is withdrawn with its valve closed,
it is possible to draw a piece of omentum into the umbilical wound by the
negative pressure so produced. This is usually recognised immediately and
the omentum is easily replaced. Herniation may occur some hours after the
operation. It is usually easy to replace it under local anaesthesia and
resuture the wound.
Herniation does not occur commonly with 5mm skin incisions.
Incisions greater than 7mm should be sutured in layers to prevent formation
of a Richter's hernia.
6. Injuries from the operating table
Care must always be taken in positioning the patient on
the operating table. Injury can be caused to the nerves of the leg and to
the hip and sacro-iliac joints. Compression of the leg veins may predispose
to venous thrombosis. The brachial plexus may be injured if the arm is abducted.
The hands may be caught in moving parts of the table.
It is important that the patient touches no metallic parts
of the table if electric energy is being used.
7. Foreign bodies
Occassionally tubal clips or rings or parts of instruments
such as saphire laser tips may be inadvertently dropped and lost in the
peritoneal cavity. They should be removed if they are easily found but there
have been no reports of long term complications from such foreign bodies.
REFERENCES
- Bassil S, Nisolle M, Donnez J (1993). Complications of endoscopic
surgery in gynaecology. Gynaecological Endoscopy, 2: 199-209
- Kane MG, Krejs GL (1984). Complications of diagnostic laparoscopy
in Dallas. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 30: 237-240

Print this page

Edited by Aldo Campana,
|